There is a time in the process of refining a project when it’s good to listen to everbody’s opinion.
Untill recently, I thought this time was always.
In my mind, if the piece was truly any good, any human could not fail to see it.
In retrospect, I can see this is ridiculous. If this were the case, there would be no such things as professional editors. I feel stupid.
Of late, I have enjoyed the complimentary editing of, first, people who–no criticism–have no real grasp on literature or its genres, and second, people who REALLY DO! Who do you think was more helpful?
I guess the take-away point here is that there is a line–a fine one, but very real–between asking for feedback from people who you know will automatically like your work, and people who actually understand what you’re trying to do, and will have something constructive to say.
Approval-seeking is not cured by pursuing people who don’t get fiction. The task of selecting an editor is a little more cerebral than that.